<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business process confusion: once more unto the breech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2005/11/business-process-confusion-once-more.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2005/11/business-process-confusion-once-more.html</link>
	<description>Thoughts on IT architecture, governance, technology trends and the business value of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:25:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vinnie Mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2005/11/business-process-confusion-once-more.html/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnie Mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2005/11/18/business-process-confusion-once-more-unto-the-breech/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>slighly different POV from Ross (though thanks to him in last week process has been getting play) my views are we have for the last 15 years been lathering our processes with too much technology, expensive people, security and compliance. It is time to revisit from a customer POV...and do some angioplasty...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2005/11/business_proces.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slighly different POV from Ross (though thanks to him in last week process has been getting play) my views are we have for the last 15 years been lathering our processes with too much technology, expensive people, security and compliance. It is time to revisit from a customer POV&#8230;and do some angioplasty&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2005/11/business_proces.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2005/11/business_proces.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinnie Mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2005/11/business-process-confusion-once-more.html/comment-page-1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnie Mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2005/11/18/business-process-confusion-once-more-unto-the-breech/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>slighly different POV from Ross (though thanks to him in last week process has been getting play) my views are we have for the last 15 years been lathering our processes with too much technology, expensive people, security and compliance. It is time to revisit from a customer POV...and do some angioplasty...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2005/11/business_proces.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slighly different POV from Ross (though thanks to him in last week process has been getting play) my views are we have for the last 15 years been lathering our processes with too much technology, expensive people, security and compliance. It is time to revisit from a customer POV&#8230;and do some angioplasty&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2005/11/business_proces.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2005/11/business_proces.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
