<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun acquires close to home to increase the velocity of identity management deployments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html</link>
	<description>Thoughts on BPM, collaboration, analytics and information management, technology trends and the business value of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:21:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gustafsson</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/comment-page-1#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gustafsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase-the-velocity-of-identity-management-deployments/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Agree with you there - great move from Sun, and I think we&#039;ll see more acquisitions from them in the Identity Management space...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you there &#8211; great move from Sun, and I think we&#8217;ll see more acquisitions from them in the Identity Management space&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gustafsson</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/comment-page-1#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gustafsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase-the-velocity-of-identity-management-deployments/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Agree with you there - great move from Sun, and I think we&#039;ll see more acquisitions from them in the Identity Management space...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you there &#8211; great move from Sun, and I think we&#8217;ll see more acquisitions from them in the Identity Management space&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gustafsson</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/comment-page-1#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gustafsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase-the-velocity-of-identity-management-deployments/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Agree with you there - great move from Sun, and I think we&#039;ll see more acquisitions from them in the Identity Management space...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you there &#8211; great move from Sun, and I think we&#8217;ll see more acquisitions from them in the Identity Management space&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Macehiter</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/comment-page-1#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Macehiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase-the-velocity-of-identity-management-deployments/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>In response to Peter&#039;s comment, I of course recognise the role that independent systems integrators play in supporting identity management initiatives - and that specialists (niche) are particularly important in rapidly evolving areas such as identity management. They also have an important role  where technologies from multiple vendors are involved.    &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Integrators are typically at the forefront of developing the best practice and implementation expertise which helps to accelerate adooption.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I also agree that technology vendors will never be in a position to satisfy all of the demand. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That being said, organisations are looking to rationalise their suppliers and identify &quot;the one throat to choke&quot;. This is where the Neogent acquisition plays for Sun: it&#039;s about reducing the barriers to  adoption of the Sun identity management technology with a packaged technology/implementation proposition. It&#039;s about accelerating adoption of Sun&#039;s identity management technology. This packaged  approach won&#039;t be relevant in all scenarios, for a variety of reasons (multi-vendor deployments; vertical market expertise etc) which is where the independent SIs can step in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Peter&#8217;s comment, I of course recognise the role that independent systems integrators play in supporting identity management initiatives &#8211; and that specialists (niche) are particularly important in rapidly evolving areas such as identity management. They also have an important role  where technologies from multiple vendors are involved.    </p>
<p>Integrators are typically at the forefront of developing the best practice and implementation expertise which helps to accelerate adooption.</p>
<p>I also agree that technology vendors will never be in a position to satisfy all of the demand. </p>
<p>That being said, organisations are looking to rationalise their suppliers and identify &#8220;the one throat to choke&#8221;. This is where the Neogent acquisition plays for Sun: it&#8217;s about reducing the barriers to  adoption of the Sun identity management technology with a packaged technology/implementation proposition. It&#8217;s about accelerating adoption of Sun&#8217;s identity management technology. This packaged  approach won&#8217;t be relevant in all scenarios, for a variety of reasons (multi-vendor deployments; vertical market expertise etc) which is where the independent SIs can step in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Macehiter</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/comment-page-1#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Macehiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase-the-velocity-of-identity-management-deployments/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>In response to Peter&#039;s comment, I of course recognise the role that independent systems integrators play in supporting identity management initiatives - and that specialists (niche) are particularly important in rapidly evolving areas such as identity management. They also have an important role  where technologies from multiple vendors are involved.    &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Integrators are typically at the forefront of developing the best practice and implementation expertise which helps to accelerate adooption.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I also agree that technology vendors will never be in a position to satisfy all of the demand. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That being said, organisations are looking to rationalise their suppliers and identify &quot;the one throat to choke&quot;. This is where the Neogent acquisition plays for Sun: it&#039;s about reducing the barriers to  adoption of the Sun identity management technology with a packaged technology/implementation proposition. It&#039;s about accelerating adoption of Sun&#039;s identity management technology. This packaged  approach won&#039;t be relevant in all scenarios, for a variety of reasons (multi-vendor deployments; vertical market expertise etc) which is where the independent SIs can step in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Peter&#8217;s comment, I of course recognise the role that independent systems integrators play in supporting identity management initiatives &#8211; and that specialists (niche) are particularly important in rapidly evolving areas such as identity management. They also have an important role  where technologies from multiple vendors are involved.    </p>
<p>Integrators are typically at the forefront of developing the best practice and implementation expertise which helps to accelerate adooption.</p>
<p>I also agree that technology vendors will never be in a position to satisfy all of the demand. </p>
<p>That being said, organisations are looking to rationalise their suppliers and identify &#8220;the one throat to choke&#8221;. This is where the Neogent acquisition plays for Sun: it&#8217;s about reducing the barriers to  adoption of the Sun identity management technology with a packaged technology/implementation proposition. It&#8217;s about accelerating adoption of Sun&#8217;s identity management technology. This packaged  approach won&#8217;t be relevant in all scenarios, for a variety of reasons (multi-vendor deployments; vertical market expertise etc) which is where the independent SIs can step in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Macehiter</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/comment-page-1#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Macehiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase-the-velocity-of-identity-management-deployments/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>In response to Peter&#039;s comment, I of course recognise the role that independent systems integrators play in supporting identity management initiatives - and that specialists (niche) are particularly important in rapidly evolving areas such as identity management. They also have an important role  where technologies from multiple vendors are involved.    &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Integrators are typically at the forefront of developing the best practice and implementation expertise which helps to accelerate adooption.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I also agree that technology vendors will never be in a position to satisfy all of the demand. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That being said, organisations are looking to rationalise their suppliers and identify &quot;the one throat to choke&quot;. This is where the Neogent acquisition plays for Sun: it&#039;s about reducing the barriers to  adoption of the Sun identity management technology with a packaged technology/implementation proposition. It&#039;s about accelerating adoption of Sun&#039;s identity management technology. This packaged  approach won&#039;t be relevant in all scenarios, for a variety of reasons (multi-vendor deployments; vertical market expertise etc) which is where the independent SIs can step in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Peter&#8217;s comment, I of course recognise the role that independent systems integrators play in supporting identity management initiatives &#8211; and that specialists (niche) are particularly important in rapidly evolving areas such as identity management. They also have an important role  where technologies from multiple vendors are involved.    </p>
<p>Integrators are typically at the forefront of developing the best practice and implementation expertise which helps to accelerate adooption.</p>
<p>I also agree that technology vendors will never be in a position to satisfy all of the demand. </p>
<p>That being said, organisations are looking to rationalise their suppliers and identify &#8220;the one throat to choke&#8221;. This is where the Neogent acquisition plays for Sun: it&#8217;s about reducing the barriers to  adoption of the Sun identity management technology with a packaged technology/implementation proposition. It&#8217;s about accelerating adoption of Sun&#8217;s identity management technology. This packaged  approach won&#8217;t be relevant in all scenarios, for a variety of reasons (multi-vendor deployments; vertical market expertise etc) which is where the independent SIs can step in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gustafsson</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/comment-page-1#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gustafsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase-the-velocity-of-identity-management-deployments/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>In Europe, we see several niche system integrators (much like Neogent) driving Identity Management business and implementations. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A good example is http://www.kogit.de/&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Is there a risk that consolidation of this type might actually slow adoption of IDM as vendors themselves can/will not be able to adress the whole market?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If we draw a parallell to integration software, most of the implementations are done by system integrators while vendors focus on product development and presale.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Any thougts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe, we see several niche system integrators (much like Neogent) driving Identity Management business and implementations. </p>
<p>A good example is <a href="http://www.kogit.de/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kogit.de/</a></p>
<p>Is there a risk that consolidation of this type might actually slow adoption of IDM as vendors themselves can/will not be able to adress the whole market?</p>
<p>If we draw a parallell to integration software, most of the implementations are done by system integrators while vendors focus on product development and presale.</p>
<p>Any thougts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gustafsson</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/comment-page-1#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gustafsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase-the-velocity-of-identity-management-deployments/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>In Europe, we see several niche system integrators (much like Neogent) driving Identity Management business and implementations. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A good example is http://www.kogit.de/&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Is there a risk that consolidation of this type might actually slow adoption of IDM as vendors themselves can/will not be able to adress the whole market?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If we draw a parallell to integration software, most of the implementations are done by system integrators while vendors focus on product development and presale.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Any thougts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe, we see several niche system integrators (much like Neogent) driving Identity Management business and implementations. </p>
<p>A good example is <a href="http://www.kogit.de/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kogit.de/</a></p>
<p>Is there a risk that consolidation of this type might actually slow adoption of IDM as vendors themselves can/will not be able to adress the whole market?</p>
<p>If we draw a parallell to integration software, most of the implementations are done by system integrators while vendors focus on product development and presale.</p>
<p>Any thougts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gustafsson</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/09/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase.html/comment-page-1#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gustafsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/sun-acquires-close-to-home-to-increase-the-velocity-of-identity-management-deployments/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>In Europe, we see several niche system integrators (much like Neogent) driving Identity Management business and implementations. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A good example is http://www.kogit.de/&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Is there a risk that consolidation of this type might actually slow adoption of IDM as vendors themselves can/will not be able to adress the whole market?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If we draw a parallell to integration software, most of the implementations are done by system integrators while vendors focus on product development and presale.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Any thougts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe, we see several niche system integrators (much like Neogent) driving Identity Management business and implementations. </p>
<p>A good example is <a href="http://www.kogit.de/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kogit.de/</a></p>
<p>Is there a risk that consolidation of this type might actually slow adoption of IDM as vendors themselves can/will not be able to adress the whole market?</p>
<p>If we draw a parallell to integration software, most of the implementations are done by system integrators while vendors focus on product development and presale.</p>
<p>Any thougts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

