<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Little SOA vs Big SOA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html</link>
	<description>Thoughts on IT architecture, governance, technology trends and the business value of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:25:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rohit</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html/comment-page-1#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/little-soa-vs-big-soa/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Very nice explanation!!!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have also observed this, to begin with the companies are looking towards &quot;Little SOA&quot; and are not very open to the idea of &quot;Big SOA&quot;. &lt;br/&gt;Little SOA looks very attractive to them and seems quite risk free and utilizes less resources to start with. Though few companies may understand the advantages and need for Big SOA, many don&#039;t. &lt;br/&gt;It is very difficult to convince clients to follow the Big SOA approach, and make them understand that in medium/long term it will give them more benefits. &lt;br/&gt;They look towards Little SOA, because it offers some sort of immediate ROI to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice explanation!!!</p>
<p>I have also observed this, to begin with the companies are looking towards &#8220;Little SOA&#8221; and are not very open to the idea of &#8220;Big SOA&#8221;. <br />Little SOA looks very attractive to them and seems quite risk free and utilizes less resources to start with. Though few companies may understand the advantages and need for Big SOA, many don&#8217;t. <br />It is very difficult to convince clients to follow the Big SOA approach, and make them understand that in medium/long term it will give them more benefits. <br />They look towards Little SOA, because it offers some sort of immediate ROI to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohit</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html/comment-page-1#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/little-soa-vs-big-soa/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Very nice explanation!!!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have also observed this, to begin with the companies are looking towards &quot;Little SOA&quot; and are not very open to the idea of &quot;Big SOA&quot;. &lt;br/&gt;Little SOA looks very attractive to them and seems quite risk free and utilizes less resources to start with. Though few companies may understand the advantages and need for Big SOA, many don&#039;t. &lt;br/&gt;It is very difficult to convince clients to follow the Big SOA approach, and make them understand that in medium/long term it will give them more benefits. &lt;br/&gt;They look towards Little SOA, because it offers some sort of immediate ROI to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice explanation!!!</p>
<p>I have also observed this, to begin with the companies are looking towards &#8220;Little SOA&#8221; and are not very open to the idea of &#8220;Big SOA&#8221;. <br />Little SOA looks very attractive to them and seems quite risk free and utilizes less resources to start with. Though few companies may understand the advantages and need for Big SOA, many don&#8217;t. <br />It is very difficult to convince clients to follow the Big SOA approach, and make them understand that in medium/long term it will give them more benefits. <br />They look towards Little SOA, because it offers some sort of immediate ROI to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Ward-Dutton</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html/comment-page-1#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Ward-Dutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/little-soa-vs-big-soa/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Steve, great input - thanks for sharing that. Your initiative sounds really interesting - if you want to chat more about it, please get in touch! neilwd at mwdadvisors dot com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, great input &#8211; thanks for sharing that. Your initiative sounds really interesting &#8211; if you want to chat more about it, please get in touch! neilwd at mwdadvisors dot com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Ward-Dutton</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html/comment-page-1#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Ward-Dutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/little-soa-vs-big-soa/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Steve, great input - thanks for sharing that. Your initiative sounds really interesting - if you want to chat more about it, please get in touch! neilwd at mwdadvisors dot com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, great input &#8211; thanks for sharing that. Your initiative sounds really interesting &#8211; if you want to chat more about it, please get in touch! neilwd at mwdadvisors dot com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rdzak</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html/comment-page-1#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rdzak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/little-soa-vs-big-soa/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Our company is currently on our second go around at SOA. Our 1st attempt was little SOA and it was not successful either from an IT or a business viewpoint.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Our current approach is big SOA and involves managed service portfolios, shared information data modeling and of course Business Process driven services.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We are just starting to see early signs of the value of big SOA, but we are by no means on the road to success. The IT organization is still struggling with making the shift and I see the tension every day to drop back to old, developer-centric habits. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Our business is also struggling with the fact that to get to the point where we can reap the benefits of big SOA, they need to transform how they work with IT in a strategic fashion as opposed to the &quot;build-to-order&quot; custom model that has been the focus of corporate IT for the last 2 decades.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If we can make it through the change curve, then I believe it will transform our organization from a build-to-order custom shop to an assemble-to-order shop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our company is currently on our second go around at SOA. Our 1st attempt was little SOA and it was not successful either from an IT or a business viewpoint.</p>
<p>Our current approach is big SOA and involves managed service portfolios, shared information data modeling and of course Business Process driven services.</p>
<p>We are just starting to see early signs of the value of big SOA, but we are by no means on the road to success. The IT organization is still struggling with making the shift and I see the tension every day to drop back to old, developer-centric habits. </p>
<p>Our business is also struggling with the fact that to get to the point where we can reap the benefits of big SOA, they need to transform how they work with IT in a strategic fashion as opposed to the &#8220;build-to-order&#8221; custom model that has been the focus of corporate IT for the last 2 decades.</p>
<p>If we can make it through the change curve, then I believe it will transform our organization from a build-to-order custom shop to an assemble-to-order shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rdzak</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html/comment-page-1#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rdzak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/little-soa-vs-big-soa/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Our company is currently on our second go around at SOA. Our 1st attempt was little SOA and it was not successful either from an IT or a business viewpoint.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Our current approach is big SOA and involves managed service portfolios, shared information data modeling and of course Business Process driven services.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We are just starting to see early signs of the value of big SOA, but we are by no means on the road to success. The IT organization is still struggling with making the shift and I see the tension every day to drop back to old, developer-centric habits. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Our business is also struggling with the fact that to get to the point where we can reap the benefits of big SOA, they need to transform how they work with IT in a strategic fashion as opposed to the &quot;build-to-order&quot; custom model that has been the focus of corporate IT for the last 2 decades.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If we can make it through the change curve, then I believe it will transform our organization from a build-to-order custom shop to an assemble-to-order shop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our company is currently on our second go around at SOA. Our 1st attempt was little SOA and it was not successful either from an IT or a business viewpoint.</p>
<p>Our current approach is big SOA and involves managed service portfolios, shared information data modeling and of course Business Process driven services.</p>
<p>We are just starting to see early signs of the value of big SOA, but we are by no means on the road to success. The IT organization is still struggling with making the shift and I see the tension every day to drop back to old, developer-centric habits. </p>
<p>Our business is also struggling with the fact that to get to the point where we can reap the benefits of big SOA, they need to transform how they work with IT in a strategic fashion as opposed to the &#8220;build-to-order&#8221; custom model that has been the focus of corporate IT for the last 2 decades.</p>
<p>If we can make it through the change curve, then I believe it will transform our organization from a build-to-order custom shop to an assemble-to-order shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Bentwood</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html/comment-page-1#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Bentwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/little-soa-vs-big-soa/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>I really like this approach. Too many companies have spent too much money failing to implement SOA.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your concept that these fail to deliver the expected business value, which is in large part due to a companies &#039;little SOA&#039; approach is spot on.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What amazes me is that this concept is not particularly new. Too often I speak with vendors about their messaging and get presented with their own internal way of looking at things instead of what is the problem that customers are facing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this approach. Too many companies have spent too much money failing to implement SOA.</p>
<p>Your concept that these fail to deliver the expected business value, which is in large part due to a companies &#8216;little SOA&#8217; approach is spot on.</p>
<p>What amazes me is that this concept is not particularly new. Too often I speak with vendors about their messaging and get presented with their own internal way of looking at things instead of what is the problem that customers are facing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Bentwood</title>
		<link>http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2007/04/little-soa-vs-big-soa.html/comment-page-1#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Bentwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/little-soa-vs-big-soa/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I really like this approach. Too many companies have spent too much money failing to implement SOA.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your concept that these fail to deliver the expected business value, which is in large part due to a companies &#039;little SOA&#039; approach is spot on.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What amazes me is that this concept is not particularly new. Too often I speak with vendors about their messaging and get presented with their own internal way of looking at things instead of what is the problem that customers are facing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this approach. Too many companies have spent too much money failing to implement SOA.</p>
<p>Your concept that these fail to deliver the expected business value, which is in large part due to a companies &#8216;little SOA&#8217; approach is spot on.</p>
<p>What amazes me is that this concept is not particularly new. Too often I speak with vendors about their messaging and get presented with their own internal way of looking at things instead of what is the problem that customers are facing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
