Comments on: BPM vendor capability comparison report http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2008/12/bpm-vendor-capability-comparison-report.html Thoughts on BPM, collaboration, analytics and information management, technology trends and the business value of IT Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:21:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Neil Ward-Dutton http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2008/12/bpm-vendor-capability-comparison-report.html/comment-page-1#comment-377 Neil Ward-Dutton Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:42:00 +0000 http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/bpm-vendor-capability-comparison-report/#comment-377 Good question Sandy. We looked at the whole of the IBM BPM Suite - both the WebSphere Dynamic Process Edition and the FileNet Active Content Edition - in the one report. IBM wanted it that way.<br/><br/>If you read the detailed IBM report, it should all become obvious...hopefully. Good question Sandy. We looked at the whole of the IBM BPM Suite – both the WebSphere Dynamic Process Edition and the FileNet Active Content Edition – in the one report. IBM wanted it that way.

If you read the detailed IBM report, it should all become obvious…hopefully.

]]> By: Sandy Kemsley http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2008/12/bpm-vendor-capability-comparison-report.html/comment-page-1#comment-376 Sandy Kemsley Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:49:00 +0000 http://mwdtemp.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/bpm-vendor-capability-comparison-report/#comment-376 Which IBM product are you assessing here? In the commentary on IBM, you talk about both of their BPM products, but those are (as I'm sure that you know) completely separate products. Have you combined the capabilities of both in your assessment? Which IBM product are you assessing here? In the commentary on IBM, you talk about both of their BPM products, but those are (as I’m sure that you know) completely separate products. Have you combined the capabilities of both in your assessment?

]]>