Software AG goes in an interesting direction for SOA governance
As part of yesterday's
release of the latest iteration of its webMethods Insight product Software AG announced an OEM partnership with Progress Software. This announcement adds the Actional runtime SOA management and monitoring technology (which Progress
acquired back in January 2006) to Software AG's existing Centrasite design-time governance capabilities (which were bolstered by
the acquisition of Infravio in September 2006) and the runtime policy enforcement provided by its webMethods X-Broker and partner Layer 7's XML Firewall.
The incorporation of runtime SOA management and monitoring functionality into Insight is a necessary evolution of Software AG-webMethods integration strategy that we commented on
just over a year ago. It's long been our position that SOA is more than a standards-based approach to software development and integration. The business value of a service-oriented initiative depends on a recognition that software services are experienced, just like their real-world analogues. The quality of that experience depends on a governance approach that extends throughout the service lifecycle, where the contracts defined when services are designed are subsequently enforced through policies once they are deployed and running - and where runtime metrics are captured to provide insight into the service level quality that is actually exeprienced. Furthermore, those metrics can be used to inform and support change management processes, so closing the SOA lifecycle loop.
Whilst the announcement doesn't come as any great surprise, the source of the runtime management and monitoring functionality does. When Oracle
confirmed it's intention to acquire BEA, I said:
It [the acquisition] leaves some of the other bigger specialist players - TIBCO, SoftwareAG (and to a lesser extent Progress and Red Hat) in an interesting position. On the one hand they will be more attractive, particularly for SOA and BPM, to customers looking for an application-independent infrastructure offering.
Software AG has gone to a potential competitor for the mantle of best-of-breed, specialist alternative to the likes of IBM, Microsoft and Oracle. If you had told me on Friday that Software AG was going to strike an OEM deal for SOA management and monitoring I'd have put my money on AmberPoint, which has historically been the OEM of choice for the likes of BEA and TIBCO.
I am not quite sure what to make of this decision. AmberPoint doesn't compete with Software AG directly and has established a healthy and growing customer base, as well as partnerships with some of the leading systems integrators - and a
technology partnership with Software AG! Software AG's decision comes not long after Oracle's decision to drop AmberPoint. As we pointed out in
our analysis of Oracle's roadmap for the BEA integration, we don't have any hard evidence for Oracle's claims that it had received negative feedback from BEA customers but it's something we will continue to explore. In light of the decision to go with Actional, it will be intriguing to see how the partnership evolves and how things pan out when Software AG and Progress are in a competitive situation.
This acquisition should be welcome news to Software AG customers that have invested in the company's SOA offerings as it will save them the time and effort of plugging the runtime governance gap that existed prior to the partnership. Those embarking on a significant SOA intiative should also give Software AG careful consideration, particularly if they are not wedded to one of the mega-platform providers.
Labels: AmberPoint, BEA, governance, ibm, Oracle, Progress, SOA, Software AG, TIBCO, webMethods
